![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Don Henley Must Die!
Posted by Will Collier · 17 February 2004
James Joyner has responded to my post below about Don Henley's WaPo op-ed, and I wanted to clarify a couple of points. James says: Much like the ability to get lots of information for free on the Internet has made people reluctant to pay for it [snip] we now have the idea that it’s Don Henley’s fault that he can’t figure out how to make a living selling one album and having everyone else share electronic copies of it. I don't have any beef with Henley or any other artist wanting to recoup royalties that they've lost through file sharing. That's an entirely legitimate complaint. (But incidentally, Don Henley doesn't need to "make a living" selling albums. He can play 150 sold-out Eagles shows a year where the cheapest nosebleed seat goes for fifty bucks. That doesn't excuse somebody ripping him off, but c'mon, the guy isn't missing any meals. His last album didn't tank because of file-sharing, either--it tanked because it was boring, pretentious crap. None of the above changes the fact that he's still getting ripped off when somebody shares "Hotel California" on an MP3, and again, I don't have any problem with him trying to do something about it--although I think it's a futile effort; more on that in a minute.) What I do have a problem with is Henley going to the federal government and saying, in effect, "I don't like it that radio stations don't play my boring, pretentious crap any more--so make some laws that force them to play it!" I've got a serious problem with that. The Feds have got better things to worry about, and I think the 'threat' of media consolidation is a joke in a world with hundreds of channels and billions of web sites. Look, I think ClearChannel sucks, too, but that's a private business operating under the First Ammendment, and they can play whatever junk they choose to play just as long as I'm free to not listen to it. What Henley is trying to avoid is the market at work--he wants daddy Government to make things right for him instead. The market is telling the music business that their products are, by and large, overpriced and under-quality. Rightly or wrongly, $18 is no longer what the market will bear for a plastic disc filled with audio. We might wish that P2P would magically go away, but the reality is that it's here to stay, and is only going to get more secure and anonymous as time goes on--because that's what the music market wants. Again, that may not be right, or legal, but it's still a fact, and one that it's not technologically feasible to change. Is there anything the government should or ought to do about this? Well, sure. If they want to encourage more varieties of music being widely available, the FCC can change the licensing fee rules that shut down the vast majority of online radio stations a while back. That right there would open up a new revenue stream for performers and unleash a million homebrew radio stations, some of which might even play Don Henley's boring, pretentious crap. The RIAA doesn't want that to happen, because they like the way things are now: they order up color-by-numbers songs from music producers, tell the radio stations what to play, ship out a bunch of lousy CDs--and then whine when the CDs don't sell. As far as I'm concerned, the record companies can go cry to the Buggy Whip Manufacturer's Association. The time of their time has come and gone. The artists are obviously another matter, but they've got options. I go to 15-20 major-act concerts a year, and I'm here to tell ya, tickets aren't getting any cheaper. As for the upcoming "minor" bands, allow me to share an anecdote: I caught Hayseed Dixie at a show a couple of years ago (great, fun band, check 'em out). During a set break, the lead singer held up their first CD and asked, "Now, how many of y'all just downloaded this thing off the internet?" Big laugh from the crowd. Barley just nodded and went on: "Well, I'll let y'all in on a secret. We don't make squat when one of these things does sell in a store, but y'all can help us out by buyin' one here at the show, or gettin' yourself a t-shirt, and the stand is right over yonder." Hayseed sold a lot of CDs that night, in no small part because they put on a great live show. Most bands that do this aren't going to make Don Henley-in-the-70's money, but a lot of the good ones are going to be able to make a living. The great ones are going to be able to make a very, very good living. You don't need the radio to make it--just ask the performers on the "Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?" soundtrack, all of whom have been playing to packed houses for years now with zero airplay. Comments
I agree on the consolidation issue. I'm not a fan of homogenization--especially since it seems to now all be Britney Spears-type teenybopper crap or hip hop--but it's not a government function to stop it as long as they aren't using monopoly powers to force up prices. Posted by: James Joyner at February 17, 2004 04:31 PMDon Henley has no Elvis in him. Posted by: Emily at February 17, 2004 04:31 PMSorry, Will--gotta disagree with your belief that ClearChannel et al. are harmless. Radio bandwidth is not an unlimited resource, and there are already significant barriers preventing you and I from exercising our right to broadcast music. Continued consolidation of radio ownership is, I believe, pushing the music industry dangerously close to the point where it becomes an illegal trust. I plan on blogging on this topic later tonight. Posted by: Mark Hasty at February 17, 2004 04:54 PMGrateful Dead, Phish...I don't think lack of radio airplay really hurt them either. I don't buy the argument that ownership consolidation is bad for the industry. It has far worse problems than who's making out the check to the DJ. Besides, there are what, 3 or 4 markets that are maxed out in radio spectrum? Everywhere else in the country you hit the seek button and watch the numbers fly by. It's a limited resource but is hardly near saturation. What the FCC should do is deregulate low power broadcasters and allow city or campus-specific radio stations to operate. there would be an explosion of choice in the marketplace, and the only loser would be dead air. Posted by: Mike M at February 17, 2004 06:28 PMHenley lost to Don Felder, didn't he? Wasn't the suit $50m? Maybe that's why he need protection, his lifestyle's about to get seriously crimped. Posted by: Sandy P. at February 17, 2004 06:42 PMI've always said that when they finally got around to the autopsy on 'Who killed rock & roll', they'd find Don Henley's fingerprints on the knife. Defending an already failed business model (small record companies) that lost to a soon-to-fail business model (big record companies) is pretty much exactly what I would expect from him. Radio has always sucked. Clear Channel didn't do that. They are just the new suckers. Posted by: blaster at February 17, 2004 08:18 PMI'd just like to point out that the argument about touring and selling concert seats is biased towards current live-band style musicians. There are a lot of artists that don't really do a live thing very often or very well - artists from Enya to Nine Inch Nails to Dead Can Dance. Also, music from the 70's and 80's doesn't have much of a live music market. I'm not saying those artists don't have revenue opportunities aside from direct CD sales, but I just want those who make the Grateful Dead/Phish/Dave Matthews argument that realize that they are excluding a large segment of the artist population by insisting on live performances and ticket sales. Posted by: Damien at February 18, 2004 09:27 AM"Rightly or wrongly, $18 is no longer what the market will bear for a plastic disc filled with audio." I don't know about $18, but I see that they move the stuff for $11-12 on the cover of the Best Buy ads. Considering that I can buy MOVIES for $6-$12 -- this past weekend, my wife and I spent $50 and got "Ghostbusters" "Monty Python/Meaning of Life" "True Stories" and silents by Chaplin and Keaton among others -- why should I even consider spending more for music? Posted by: Bill Peschel at February 18, 2004 02:08 PM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"A top blogger, even if he doesn’t spell his first name properly."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |