![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
At the Movies
Posted by Stephen Green · 28 January 2004
Cold Mountain got the shaft: "Cold Mountain," Anthony Minghella's $83 million Civil War epic failed to nab key nominations for best picture, best director, or for its screenplay or lead actress Nicole Kidman. It received nominations for actors Jude Law and Renee Zellweger, and for cinematography, editing and music, but that's all. Was it a snub of its studio, Miramax, considered the most dominant player at recent Oscar ceremonies? There's another possibility. I haven't seen the movie, so what I'm about to say is based solely on the trailer (which I saw at a screening of Return of the King). If the trailer represented the movie properly, then the theme of the thing seemed to be "war is so terrible, that there's nothing worth fighting for." I could be wrong. I only saw the trailer. But the message it sent was enough to put me off seeing the movie. And maybe enough to put off Oscar voters? Anyone here seen it? Comments
Don't bother. Your impression from the trailer is dead on! I felt the anti-war undertones overshadowed a pretty good story. Renee does deserve the supporting actress nomination though! She was the best part of the movie. Posted by: Ace at January 28, 2004 02:41 PMNicole won last year, why should they nominate this year? Posted by: Sandy P. at January 28, 2004 03:19 PMWarble Augur had a very interesting discussion on Cold Mountain here in which a number of interesting points and problems are raised, some of which might explain the lack of Oscar nods. Myria Posted by: Myria at January 28, 2004 03:24 PMHuh, apparently you have to scroll down to "Cold Mountain" as that isn't a direct permalink. Myria Posted by: Myria at January 28, 2004 03:26 PMmovie sucked.. way too long (like lotr ish) very stridently anti-war waste of 3.5 hours and 30 bucks renee.. ok but she's done much better, though she always seems to get nominaitons... should have gotten it for down with love, rather than this Posted by: hey at January 28, 2004 04:16 PMHaven't seen the movie, but the notion that Hollywood would be turned off by an anti-war theme seems unlikely. But ROTK and Master & Commander received the most nominations and both involved righteousness in war themes. So who knows. What I thought was interesting was that the 2 most nominated movies combined for 21 nominations, but none for acting. Personally, I though the blond kid from M&C gave the most compelling performance I saw all year. Paul Bettany was darn good too. But neither of them got much buzz, so no surprise. I was highly disappointed that Sean Astin was snubbed. Posted by: denise at January 28, 2004 04:32 PMI haven't seen the film either, but Anthony Minghella, its director, is quoted on The Internet Movie Database as saying, "The only lesson to extract from any civil war is that it's pointless and futile and ugly, and that there is nothing glamorous or heroic about it. There are heroes, but the causes are never heroic." Gee, I guess freeing the slaves doesn't count as heroic in Mr. Minghella's eyes. Ed Posted by: Ed Driscoll at January 28, 2004 05:50 PM"Cold Mountain" arguably the most boring and badly written book ever. Posted by: erp at January 28, 2004 07:15 PMThe filmakers turned their noses up at Civil-War recreators willing to work for free and instead used Romanians... Way to build an audience. Posted by: DANEgerus at January 28, 2004 08:29 PMI did not like the film. Also, if you have any respect for a southern accent, steer clear of this film. Jude Law, Renay Zell, and nicole kidman all butcher it. Posted by: bj at January 28, 2004 08:40 PMOTOH, I would probably see a movie that was based on the good parts of screwing Natalie, Renee, and Nicole. Drop the war bits. Posted by: Leo at January 28, 2004 08:56 PMI saw this movie and kinda liked it. It wasn't great, but I liked it better than I expected. I didn't think it was anti-war so much as against the Confederate side of that war. Posted by: Michael J. Totten at January 28, 2004 09:39 PMDunno about the movie, but Minghella's parents make some of the best ice cream in the world (he's from my home town). Not exactly germane, but...mmm, ice cream. Posted by: David Gillies at January 28, 2004 11:10 PMI didn't see the movie, but I did read the book. I thought it was very much like "Going After Cacciatto". Not neccesarily anti-war, just a strong desire to believe that there has to be something better, somewhere, and that it's never "here". The term we use in the Army is called "over-bitching", where no matter how crappy things were at your last posting, they are somehow worse at your current assignment. I think the book followed that premise right to the end, and if the movie did as well, I can see where folks would find it hard to get excited about it winning an Oscar. Posted by: Diggs at January 29, 2004 07:28 AMMy wife knew it was a kiss of death as she was going on and on and on, turned to me and asked, "Well, what did you think?" "Reminded me of 'The English Patient'." A more devastating review could appear nowhere else on this earth. Posted by: flogger at January 29, 2004 09:00 PMThe movie just dragged on and on, and yeah, there was definitely a theme of the pointlessness of war. Not great timing for that theme. What bothered me more was how they made it seem like the war was all about slavery. Right. Personally, I thought Jude Law's performance was great, while Renee's was crap (and I'm a hetero guy). She just seemed like a Hollywood actress playing a role, and making it really over the top. Just my opinion, but for me she actually detracted from the movie. Posted by: Jay at January 29, 2004 09:53 PM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"The James Bond of the Blogosphere."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |