VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Two Losers for the Price of One Non-Scandal
Posted by Stephen Green  ·  25 September 2002

Tom Daschle wants George Bush to apologize for saying, "the Senate is more interested in special interests in Washington and not interested in the security of the American people."

Daschle claims Bush is trying to "politicize this war. We ought not politicize the rhetoric about war and life and death."

Well, that's not quite true. Bush was speaking of Senate inaction on the bill creating a Department of Homeland Security. The rest of Bush's statement said, "I will not accept a Department of Homeland Security that does not allow this president, and future presidents, to better keep the American people secure."

Daschle loses points for being a crybaby and misrepresenting what the President said. Bush loses points for using such invective to force action on a bad bill creating a useless, but possibly oppressive, new Federal bureaucracy.

They can both go to their rooms without supper.

Comments

I just wish there could be a moratorium placed on accusations of "playing politics." First, because everything politicians do is playing politics. And second because the charge itself is playing politics, rendering anyone who makes it a hypocrite of the first order.

Posted by: Doug Turnbull at September 25, 2002 02:24 PM

*Sigh* What's the problem with kids today?

Posted by: M at September 25, 2002 02:34 PM

I agree with Bush on external defense and Daschle on homeland defense.

Congress is rightly loathe to void whistle-blower protection for the new Homeland Security Department given the Bush Administration's refusal to hold anyone to account for the intelligence failures which killed 3000 Americans on 9/11. The only reason we've learned about those is because of whistle-blower protection.

If the Bush Administration won't do its job, it is insane to let it keep Congress from doing their job.

Posted by: Tom Holsinger at September 25, 2002 02:50 PM

Here is what Bush said : "So I ask congress to give me the flexibility necessary to be able to deal with the true threats of the 21st century by being able to move the right people to the right place at the right time so we can better assure America that we are doing everything possible. The house responded but the senate is more interested in special interests in washington, and not interested in the security of the American people. I will not accept a department of homeland security that does not allow this president and future presidents (the flexibility) to better keep the American people secure. People are working hard in washington to get it right in washington, both republicans and democrats. You see this isn't a partisan issue. This is an American issue. This is an issue which is vital to our future..." (My transcription from CSpan)

Posted by: Brian at September 25, 2002 04:27 PM

It's a two-sided coin, civil service protection. The same protection that protects against whistleblowers also makes it impossible to fire people for making mistakes. (The ones who can be fired are the political appointees.) If you think replacing the people at the top is enough, no problem. (Maybe that's enough.) If you fear that a department has a rotten culture that no one guy at the top can fix, it's a problem. If you worry that some employees just aren't competent enough to do the job, it's a problem.
Anyway, Mickey Kaus's discussion is reasonable, fair, and balanced. He dicussses the problems and lists a compromise. Most of the approaches have problems.

Posted by: John Thacker at September 25, 2002 04:49 PM

It wasn't fair of Bush to make that comment. Yes, it is true, but, if the Democrats were really interested in the security of the American people, then they'd have to resign, and that's asking too much.

Posted by: Frank at September 25, 2002 05:10 PM

Now that politicizing is bad, Senator Daschle has a new strategy for running his potential presidential campaign, according to ScrappleFace.

Posted by: Scott Ott at September 25, 2002 06:20 PM

Mr. Thacker,

We _know_ that the FBI and CIA are criminally incompetent and Bush still won't fire any of them. Instead he proposes to give them more money not to do what they're already not doing.

The problem is lack of will to fire people who should be fired, not lack of ability to fire them.

Why should President Bush be given the power to fire whistle-blowers when he won't fire the incompetents who got so many Americans killed?

So far Bush has shown every reason not to give him more domestic power. He won't use the power he already has.

Are you going to argue that the solution to failed school systems is to give them more money?

Posted by: Tom Holsinger at September 25, 2002 07:07 PM

Not that it excuses Bush or anything, but his insulting rhetoric is a virtual cut-and-paste of what Democrats were saying during the airport security debate of a year ago.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek at September 25, 2002 07:44 PM

Parse it how you will, the fact is that Bush accused the Senate of not being concerned about national security. That's an outrageous statement. Daschle is right to demand an apology.

It's the same old Republican game: question your opponents' patriotism and then crawfish away when you're called on it.

Posted by: Bernard Yomtov at September 25, 2002 07:59 PM

Tom,

He can't fire them. They have Civil Service Protections. They cannot be fired. Re-assigned, perhaps, but not fired. That is a real tragedy. That is why Bush wants to have control over this new agency. It is a Trojan Horse to slowly erode the Eternal Bureaucracy.

IMHO, Bush has comitted a grievous error in not immediately firing all of the political appointees who "serve at the pleasure of the President." I fail to see how any clintonoid should still be drawing a Federal paycheck. It is a terrible oversight and I cannot imagine why nothing has been done to date.

Oh, and Bernard, the dems are gutless weasels. They deserve being called on this and it's funny to watch them squeal when they have been hit where it hurts. They only get puffed up when there's no substantive comeback to make. Problem was, he never did question their patriotism. He should have.

Posted by: BrewingFrog at September 25, 2002 08:13 PM

Dasche has hinted at, and others have outright claimed that President Bush is going to war with Iraq to distract from domestic issues. Accordingly, Daschle not only has no goddamn right to ask for an apology, but Daschle ought to commit harikiri to atone for his slimebag attacks.

Posted by: Robin Roberts at September 25, 2002 09:09 PM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"The James Bond of the Blogosphere."
-Venomous Kate

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori